Regular paper

Association of vitamin D with deoxyribonucleic acid (dna) damage: A systematic review of animal and human studies

Mayang Indah Lestari1,2, Krisna Murti3✉, Iche Andriyani Liberty4, Zen Hafy1,
Violantina Linardi5, Muhammad Khoirudin5 and Tungki Pratama Umar5

1Doctoral Study Program in Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia; 2Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University-Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital – Siti Fatimah General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia; 3Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University-Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia; 4Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia; 5Research Assistant, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia

Vitamin D has anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory, and apoptotic abilities. Vitamin D deficiency can induce deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage. The aim of the study was to create a systematic review to analyze the relationship between vitamin D and DNA damage in various populations. PubMed, Scopus, EbscoHost, Google Scholar, and Epistemonikos were used to identify literature regarding the relationship between vitamin D and DNA damage. Assessment of study quality was carried out by three independent reviewers individually. A total of 25 studies were assessed as eligible and included in our study. Twelve studies were conducted in humans consisting of two studies with experimental design and ten studies with observational pattern. Meanwhile, thirteen studies were conducted in animals (in vivo). It is found that the majority of studies demonstrated that vitamin D prevents DNA damage and minimizes the impact of DNA damage that has occurred (p<0.05). However, two studies (8%) did not find such an association and one research only found a specific association in the cord blood, not in maternal blood. Vitamin D has a protective effect against DNA damage. A diet rich in vitamin D and vitamin D supplementation is recommended to prevent DNA damage.

Keywords: vitamin D, DNA damage, observational studies, in vivo studies, systematic review

Received: 31 January, 2023; revised: 15 May, 2023; accepted:
16 May, 2023; available on-line: 17 June, 2023

✉e-mail: krisna.arinafril@unsri.ac.id

Abbreviations: γH2AX, phosphorylated histone H2AX; 1,25(OH)2D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D; 8-OH-dG, 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine; 25(OH)D, 25 hydroxy vitamin D; NF-κB, Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; T2DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus; UV, Ultraviolet; VDR, Vitamin D receptor

Introduction

Vitamin D and its receptors play an essential role in cancer development due to its anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory, and apoptotic properties (Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012a; Deuster et al., 2017; Elhusseini et al., 2018). Endogenous synthesis of vitamin D begins with cholesterol oxidation, producing pro-vitamin D3. In the skin, Ultraviolet B (UVB) from sunlight converts pro-vitamin D3 to pre-vitamin D3. Then, isomerization of pre-vitamin D3 is done, with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) as its main end product (Osmancevic et al., 2015). Two hydroxylations by the enzymes vitamin D 25-hydroxylase (CYP27A1) and renal mitochondrial 1-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) are required to convert vitamin D3 to active 1,25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol). Calcitriol binds to vitamin D receptors (VDRs) belonging to the nuclear receptor family and forms a complex with RXR to regulate gene expression (Deuster et al., 2017). VDRs are nuclear receptor superfamily members expressed in tumours to regulate cell cycle-related proliferation and angiogenesis (Khrisnan et al., 2012; Christakos et al., 2015). In addition, vitamin D has been shown in several studies to be effective in stimulating Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis in mature alveolar cells, modulating epithelial cell proliferation, and repairing injury (Usman et al., 2021).

Furthermore, adequate vitamin D levels help to maintain DNA integrity. Vitamin D’s role can be divided into two categories: primary functions that prevent DNA damage and secondary processes that regulate cell growth rate (Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012a; Wenclewska et al., 2019). Vitamin D is really crucial since its deficiency is associated with an increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei formations, and alteration of comet assays (related to oxidative stress, hypoxic, and apoptotic process), some important indicators of DNA damage (Peng et al., 2010; Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012a; O’Callaghan-Gordo et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019). The potential of vitamin D in reducing oxidative DNA damage in humans refers to clinical trials in which vitamin D supplementation reduced levels of 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), an oxidative damage biomarker found in colorectal epithelial crypt cells (Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012a). Vitamin D administration has also been shown to reduce oxidative stress-induced damage and chromosomal aberration, prevent telomere shortening, and inhibit telomerase activity in animal models and cell lines (Siebert et al., 2018). Vitamin D’s secondary functions in preventing DNA damage include regulating poly-adenosine diphosphate/ADP-ribose polymerase activity on the DNA damage response pathway during the DNA lesion detection process. Vitamin D can also inhibit the replication of damaged DNA and regulate apoptosis, which promotes cell death (Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012a).

Although vitamin D has long been discussed as one of the essential DNA protectors, a systematic review of the relationship between vitamin D and DNA damage has yet to be found. As a result, the purpose of this study is to use a systematic review approach to examine the association between vitamin D and DNA damage in different populations of human studies and animal models.

Methods

The manuscript was arranged using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines (Page et al., 2021). All members approved the review panel’s study procedure before conducting the literature search. The protocol has been registered in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) with the registration number: CRD42023393054.

Literature retrieval

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across five databases to identify manuscripts on the relationship between vitamin D levels and DNA damage in human and animal subjects. The articles were discovered using Scopus, PubMed, EBSCOHost, Google Scholar, and Epistemonikos. Hand-searching was also conducted based on the included study bibliography to identify relevant publications that were not indexed in the previously reported databases (Umar et al., 2022). There will be no restrictions on geographical region or gender. However, we restricted our search to studies published between January 2012 and January 2023. The investigation was completed by January 19th, 2023. To ensure its validity, the study must be published in English. The search terms for this study are available as Supplementary Table 1 at https://ojs.ptbioch.edu.pl/index.php/abp/.

Study selection

We sought animal and human studies investigating the link between vitamin D levels and DNA damage. Studies must demonstrate the influence of a single vitamin D substance administration on DNA damage (rather than a formulation containing multiple compounds) to be considered. The study was deemed ineligible if its design consisted of a literature review (e.g., systematic review, narrative review, scoping review), opinion, book chapter, and editorial. Meanwhile, included studies must have access to the full text. As a result, we excluded conference abstracts, posters, and unretrieved complete records. Duplicates were removed from the literature retrieval. Three independent reviewers (VL, MK, and ZH) assessed titles and abstracts (primary screening) using a semi-automated process aided by Rayyan QCRI software (Ouzzani et al., 2016; Umar & Siburian, 2022). Following the completion of the first screening stage, the full text was assessed by two reviewers (IAL and TPU) to determine its eligibility for inclusion in the review. Any disagreements were discussed and resolved by a senior author (MIL) at any stage of manuscript evaluation.

Data extraction

The following information was extracted from the data: authorship, country of study, research participant data in the form of age, sex, and comorbidities (human), as well as experimental research data on animal type and age (animal studies), DNA damage parameters (comet tail length, tail DNA, and tail moment; phosphorylated Histone H2AX (γH2AX), 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), chromosomal aberration, DNA damage score, micronuclei formation, telomere length, urinary cyclobutane thymine (T–T) dimer, and DNA repair indicator), and main findings. The information was recorded on the extraction sheet using Microsoft Office Excel 2019. Because of the vast diversity among included studies, the findings were presented as a qualitative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis.

Risk of bias analysis

The risk of bias (RoB) analysis was conducted for the animal studies using The Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation’s risk of bias (SYRCLE’s RoB) tool. The RoB tool from SYRCLE contains ten items related to selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, reporting bias, and other biases (Hooijmans et al., 2014). Meanwhile, we used three different scales for human studies: the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (for observational studies), the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (ROB-2). The Newcastle Ottawa Scale is divided into three major domains (selection, comparability, and outcome) (Liana et al., 2022). In contrast, the ROBINS-I (Sterne et al., 2016) and ROB-2 (Sterne et al., 2019) are divided into several parts within the pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention stages. The evaluation was carried out independently by two authors (IAL and TPU). In the event of a disagreement, the decision is made by a senior author (KM).

Results

The search strategy identified a total of 942 studies. The search query found 551 studies on SCOPUS, 140 on Google Scholar, 211 on PubMed, 28 on EbscoHost, and 12 on Epistemonikos. Following duplicate detection, 243 studies were excluded. Then, 699 studies entered title and abstract screening, where 56 studies were deemed eligible for full-text screening, which resulted in 24 studies being included in the final analysis. Meanwhile, six studies were identified from the citation search, and only one was finally contained. This process resulted in 25 selected studies (13 animal studies/in vivo and 12 human studies (two experimental studies and ten observational research)) considered in the final process of manuscript evaluation (Fig. 1).

Study characteristics

All of the included studies evaluated the association of vitamin D with DNA damage. Animal studies (Table 1) were done on the vitamin D-deficient diet (Chen et al., 2018; Elhusseini et al., 2018; Merino et al., 2018), hypertension (Machado et al., 2016, 2019), oxidative stress (Haq et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019), and neurological disorder (Alfawaz et al., 2014; Mehri et al., 2020). Meanwhile, all of the following parameters were assessed only in one study: diabetes mellitus (Meerza et al., 2012), high-fat diet (Merino et al., 2018), kidney disease (Mohammed et al., 2019), aging (Qiao et al., 2020), and ovariectomy (Siebert et al., 2018) model. There are four main DNA damage detection methods, including immunohistochemistry (Chen et al., 2018; Elhusseini et al., 2018; Mohammed et al., 2019), comet assay (alkaline comet assay) (Alfawaz et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2019; Machado et al., 2016, 2019; Siebert et al., 2018), Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Haq et al., 2019; Mehri et al., 2020), and micronuclei detection (Liu et al., 2019; Machado et al., 2016). Meanwhile, other detection methods are flow cytometry (Merino et al., 2018), gel electrophoresis (Haq et al., 2019), Western blot (Qiao et al., 2020) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Siebert et al., 2018). Rodents, both mice and rats, were used as animal models in all studies. It was found that all DNA damage parameters are associated with vitamin D levels, except in one study which did not find significant difference in the percentage of DNA in comet tails in the vitamin D deficiency group when compared to the control group (Machado et al., 2019). Another study also showed that the preventive impact of vitamin D supplementation is better than its treatment effect to ameliorate DNA damage (Alfawaz et al., 2014).

Human research (Table 2) were conducted in experimental (randomized and non-randomized clinical trial) (Wenclewska et al., 2019; Gungor et al., 2022) and observational (cross-sectional and cohort) (Ladeira et al., 2015; Lan et al., 2014; Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012b; Najeeb et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2021; O’Callaghan-Gordo et al., 2017; Petersen et al., 2014; Usman et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2016; Fagundes et al., 2019) design. In human studies, the most commonly employed parameter is comet assay (comet tail length, DNA damage score, and percentage of DNA in comet tail) (Fagundes et al., 2019; Lan et al., 2014; Najeeb et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2016; Wenclewska et al., 2019) and micronuclei formation (buccal or lymphocyte) (Fagundes et al., 2019; Ladeira et al., 2015; Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012b; O’Callaghan-Gordo et al., 2017; Usman et al., 2021). Other parameters are aniline blue staining (sperm DNA damage) (Gungor et al., 2022), thymine dimer (Petersen et al., 2014), and ELISA (urinary 8-OHdG) (Usman et al., 2021). Several conditions were observed in the included studies, such as diabetes mellitus, cancer, obesity, vitamin D-deficient state, and infertility. A similar finding was also observed in animal studies when the majority of the investigations revealed a significant association between vitamin D and DNA damage status. However, a study on workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde (Ladeira et al., 2015) and on the general population (Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012b) did not show a significant association between vitamin D level and micronuclei formation, while another study only found the association in cord blood but not in maternal blood (O’Callaghan-Gordo et al., 2017). Another research also did not present any association between vitamin D level and comet assay result as the DNA damage marker in the general population (Wang et al., 2016).

Risk of Bias

All of the animal studies included in the analysis followed a similar pattern (Figs 2 and 4), with a low risk of bias on baseline characteristics, random outcome assessment, selective outcome reporting, and other biases. However, it is noteworthy that allocation concealment, random housing, and intervention blinding were not met by all studies, resulting in a high risk of bias. Meanwhile, only four studies (Liu et al., 2019; Mehri et al., 2020; Mohammed et al., 2019; Siebert et al., 2018) have a low risk of bias for outcome assessor blinding, and only two studies (Mehri et al., 2020; Siebert et al., 2018) have a low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data analysis.

We assessed the risk of bias in human studies (Fig. 3) using three scales: NOS, ROBINS-I, and ROB-2. Most studies (10/12; 83.33%) have moderate/some concerns about bias. A non-randomized study, on the other hand, runs the risk of bias due to insufficient intervention classification. Meanwhile, there is only one study (O’Callaghan-Gordo et al., 2017) that has a low overall risk of bias. According to the summary graph (Fig. 4) on observational studies, 70% have a high risk of bias on comparability due to a lack of explanation on confounding control. However, regarding selection, 70% of the studies have a low risk of bias, and 20% of the included research has a high risk of bias. Most studies have a moderate risk of bias in outcome assessment, primarily due to non-blinding outcome assessment.

Discussion

DNA damage can be divided into two types, endogenous and exogenous. Endogenous DNA damage stems from chemically active DNA involved in hydrolytic and oxidative reactions with air and reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are naturally present in cells. On the contrary, exogenous DNA damage occurs due to the involvement of environmental, physical, and chemical substances such as UV and ionizing radiation, alkylating agents, and cross-linking agents (Chatterjee & Walker, 2018). Vitamin D is regarded as an essential factor in the status of DNA damage (Najeeb et al., 2020). Vitamin D deficiency (plasma 25(OH)D <50 nmol/l) and severe deficiency (<30 nmol/l) have been associated with elevated oxidative stress, DNA damage promotion, and overall mortality (Wang et al., 2016). The impact of vitamin D on DNA damage is prominent in several disorders, including hyperglycemia and cancer (Gabryanczyk et al., 2021).

Hyperglycemia increases the production of free radicals and also induces DNA damage (Giacco & Brownlee, 2010). Studies conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) showed that vitamin D significantly prevented DNA damage and oxidative stress in patients with T2DM (p<0.05). A vitamin D-responsive element has been identified in the promotion region of the insulin receptor gene in human (Gikas et al., 2009). Pancreatic cells express the nuclear receptor for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), which modulates insulin action (Bland et al., 2004). Furthermore, vitamin D minimizes insulin resistance by its effect on calcium and phosphorus metabolism along with the upregulation of the insulin receptor gene, as well as suppression of the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines that contribute to insulin resistance, including interleukins and TNF-α due to its antioxidative properties (Wenclewska et al., 2019; Maestro et al., 2002; Talaei et al., 2013).

In malignancy, vitamin D had positive functions as anti-proliferative, proapoptotic, anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenesis, anti-metastatic, and anti-invasion as well as estrogen signaling inhibitor (Vuolo et al., 2012; Deuster et al., 2017; Wacker & Holiack, 2013). Calcitriol (the active form of vitamin D) inhibits the proliferation of many malignant cells by inducing cell cycle arrest and cell accumulation in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. In cells, calcitriol causes G1/G0 arrest in a p53-dependent manner by increasing the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21Waf/Cip1 and p27Kip1, decreasing the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), and causing hypo-phosphorylation. Calcitriol also increases the expression of p73, a homolog of p53, which is associated with the induction of apoptosis in several human and murine tumor systems. Suppression of p73 abrogates calcitriol-induced apoptosis and reduces the ability of calcitriol to enhance the cytotoxic effect of agents such as gemcitabine and cisplatin in a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) model (Krishnan & Feldman, 2010; Khrisnan et al., 2012). In the previous study, it was found that vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for malignancy (cancer) and accelerates the invasion process (Najeeb et al., 2020; Migliaccio et al., 2022). The population of the 25 studies in this systematic review is diverse. Twelve studies conducted in humans analyzed DNA damage in patients with comorbid diseases such as T2DM, obesity, infertility, cancer patients, and the general population. Meanwhile, thirteen in vivo studies analyzed DNA damage using animal models with hypertension, ovariectomy, nephrotoxicity, vitamin D deficiency, and oxidative stress.

Several studies on vitamin D indicated that the vitamin has a beneficial impact on all organ systems of the human body. Both 25(OH)D and its hormonally active form, 1,25(OH)2D are vital for physiological functions, especially to reduce inflammation and excessive cellular oxidative stress. The 1,25(OH)2D hormone or calcitriol modulates cell proliferation through direct and indirect pathways, such as by the inhibition of the transcription factor, Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) which is associated with an elevation of oxidative stress and cellular response to inflammation and injury (Tilstra et al., 2012). Due to suppression of NF-κB activation, calcitriol helps to reduce chronic inflammation (Myszka & Klinger, 2014). However, more research into the relationship between DNA damage, oxidative stress, and vitamin D is required.

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is found in testicular tissue, prostate, and spermatozoa. In addition, the intense metabolism of vitamin D in the male reproductive system and increased expression of VDR in the neck of the sperm cause males to require vitamin D for functionally active sperm (Jensen et al., 2011). Incubation of semen samples with vitamin D for 30 minutes led to a significant increase in sperm velocity parameters. This progressive increase in motility is due to vitamin D-dependent calcium release and subsequent cyclic AMP/protein kinase A (cAMP/PKA) activation and Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production (Gunter et al., 2004). There was a significant negative correlation (p<0.05) between vitamin D and sperm DNA damage in this systematic review. After binding to the VDR receptor, vitamin D initiates slow genomic effects by stimulating the release of ligand-activated transcription factors in the nucleus. In unexplained infertile patients with vitamin D deficiency, sperm DNA damage may occur due to delayed genomic effects (Jurutka et al., 2001).

Studies in various animal models showed that vitamin D exerts a protective effect on DNA. Vitamin D can reduce the DNA damage index (percentage of DNA in comet tails assessed from comet tests). In addition, in genomic instability animal models induced by cyclophosphamide, vitamin D can reduce the frequency of micronuclei formation (a marker of DNA damage). Besides the percentage of DNA in comet tails and the frequency of micronuclei, DNA damage can also be assessed by the levels of 8-OHdG, a marker of oxidative DNA damage (Smith et al., 2005). Elevated levels of 8-OHdG in rat animal models are also associated with a complete loss of VDR expression. Because the expression of VDR depends on the availability of 1,25(OH)2D, the loss of VDR suggests that there may be a role for 1,25(OH)2D in protecting cells against hyperproliferation and oxidative DNA damage (Kállay et al., 2002; Nair-Shalliker et al., 2012a). Decreased levels of 8-OHdG after vitamin D supplementation was proven in the animal model studies (Haq et al., 2019; Mohammed et al., 2019). The results of studies in animal models (in vivo) are in line with those of studies in cells (in vitro) (Chen et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019). These outcomes can confirm that vitamin D has a protective effect on DNA.

Various parameters of oxidative stress are also presented in this systematic review. In human studies, vitamin D supplementation led to a significant decrease in NO and total thiols and an increase in the concentration of reduced glutathione (GSH) leading to a decrease in oxidative processes in cells (Fagundes et al., 2019). In a study of animal models with hypertension, vitamin D was not significantly associated with DNA damage. However, vitamin D3 deficiency alters the level of Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substance (TBARS) in a mouse model of spontaneous hypertension, which is an indicator of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-initiated peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids in membrane lipids and alters the permeability, fluidity, and integrity of the plasma membrane (Potter et al., 2011). Lipid peroxidation predisposes patients to conditions such as hypertension and thromboembolic (Yavuzer et al., 2016). Vitamin D can reduce oxidative stress that occurs in cells thereby reducing DNA damage.

This systematic review proved that vitamin D protects against DNA damage. However, there are some limitations to this systematic review. First, the study populations are largely heterogeneous with different diseases and DNA damage parameters; thus, the results can be biased. In addition, human studies are still sparse (only one randomized controlled trial/RCT) and mainly with a moderate RoB. Consequently, the application of the results to humans still needs to be considered. Further studies with randomized controlled trial designs are expected in the future to increase the strength of evidence.

Conclusion

There is a significant association between vitamin D and DNA damage. However, although the majority of studies have found that vitamin D has a protective effect against DNA damage, other research found contradictory findings. Thus, the need of further investigations with stricter criteria must be commenced. Nevertheless, it is safe to conclude that a diet with sufficient vitamin D content and supplementation (more than 1000 IU/day, preferably about 2000–5000 IU/day) is recommended to prevent DNA damage and oxidative stress in cells.

References

Alfawaz HA, Bhat RS, Al-Ayadhi L, El-Ansary AK (2014) Protective and restorative potency of vitamin D on persistent biochemical autistic features induced in propionic acid-intoxicated rat pups. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 14: 416. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-416

Bland R, Markovic D, Hills CE, Hughes S V., Chan SL, Squires PE, Hewison M (2004) Expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1alpha-hydroxylase in pancreatic islets. J. Steroid Biochem. 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.115

Chatterjee N, Walker GC (2018) Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 58: 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22087.Mechanisms

Chen L, Yang R, Qiao W, Yuan X, Wang S, Goltzman D, Miao D (2018) 1,25-Dihydroxy vitamin D prevents tumorigenesis by inhibiting oxidative stress and inducing tumor cellular senescence in mice. Int. J. Cancer 143: 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31317

Christakos S, Dhawan P, Verstuyf A, Verlinden L, Carmeliet G (2015) Vitamin D: Metabolism, molecular mechanism of action, and pleiotropic effects. Physiol. Rev. 96: 365–408. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00014.2015

Deuster E, Jeschke U, Ye Y, Mahner S, Czogalla B (2017) Vitamin D and VDR in gynecological cancers-A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18: 2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112328

Elhusseini H, Elkafas H, Abdelaziz M, Halder S, Atabiekov I, Eziba N, Ismail N, El Andaloussi A, Al-Hendy A (2018) Diet-induced vitamin D deficiency triggers inflammation and DNA damage profile in murine myometrium. Int. J. Womens. Health 10: 503–514. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S163961

Fagundes G, Macan T, Rohr P, Damiani A, Rocha F Da, Pereira M, Longaretti L, Vilela T, Ceretta L, Mendes C, Silveira P, Teixeira J, Andrade V de (2019) Vitamin D3 as adjuvant in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: modulation of genomic and biochemical instability. Mutagenesis 34: 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gez001

Gabryanczyk A, Klimczak S, Szymczak-Pajor I, Śliwińska A (2021) Is vitamin D deficiency related to increased cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22: 6444. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126444

Giacco F, Brownlee M (2010) Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ. Res. 1058–1070. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223545

Gikas A, Sotiropoulos A, Pastromas V, Papazafiropoulou A, Apostolou O, Pappas S (2009) Seasonal variation in fasting glucose and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. Prim. Care Diabetes 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2009.05.004

Gungor K, Gungor ND, Basar MM, Cengiz F, Ersahin SS, Cil K (2022) Relationship between serum vitamin D levels semen parameters and sperm DNA damage in men with unexplained infertility. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 26: 499–505. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202201_27875

Gunter T, Yule D, Gunter K, Elisee R, Salter J (2004) Calcium and mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 567: 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2004.03.071

Haq SH, AlAfaleq NO, Johari R Al (2019) Vitamin D treatment reverses the induced oxidative stress damage to DNA. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 22: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2019.8.14

Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW (2014) SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 14: 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43

Jensen M, Bjerrum P, Jessen T, Nielsen J, Joensen U, Olesen I, Petersen J, Juul A, Dissing S, Jorgensen N (2011) Vitamin D is positively associated with sperm motility and increases intracellular calcium in human spermatozoa. Hum. Reprod. 26: 1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der059

Jurutka P, Whitfield G, Hsieh J, Thompson P, Haussler C, Haussler M (2001) Molecular nature of the vitamin D receptorand its role in regulation of gene expression. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2: 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010062929140

Kállay E, Bareis P, Bajna E, Kriwanek S, Bonner E, Toyokuni S, Cross HS (2002) Vitamin D receptor activity and prevention of colonic hyperproliferation and oxidative stress. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40: 1191–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00030-3

Khrisnan A, Trump D, Johnson C (2012) The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention and treatment. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 38: 161–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2012.03.014

Krishnan A V., Feldman D (2010) Molecular pathways mediating the anti-inflammatory effects of calcitriol: Implications for prostate cancer chemoprevention and treatment. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 17: 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-09-0139

Ladeira C, Pádua M, Veiga L, Viegas S, Carolino E, Gomes MC, Brito M (2015) Influence of serum levels of vitamins A, D, and E as well as vitamin D receptor polymorphisms on micronucleus frequencies and other biomarkers of genotoxicity in workers exposed to formaldehyde. Lifestyle Genomics 8: 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444486

Lan N, Luo G, Yang X, Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Wang X, Xie T, Li G, Liu Z (2014) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3-deficiency enhances oxidative stress and corticosteroid resistance in severe asthma exacerbation. PLoS One 9: e111599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111599

Liana P, Liberty IA, Murti K, Hafy Z, Salim EM, Zulkarnain M, Umar TP (2022) A systematic review on neutrophil extracellular traps and its prognostication role in COVID-19 patients. Immunol. Res. 70: 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-022-09293-w

Liu H, Feng X, Wu S, Zong T, Li B, Zhang, Zengli (2019) Vitamin D resists cyclophosphamide-induced genomic and DNA damage in CHL cells in vitro and in mice in vivo. Nutr. Cancer 71: 1030–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2019.1595050

Machado C da S, Venancio VP, Aissa AF, Hernandes LC, de Mello MB, Del Lama JEC, Marzocchi-Machado CM, Bianchi MLP, Antunes LMG (2016) Vitamin D3 deficiency increases DNA damage and the oxidative burst of neutrophils in a hypertensive rat model. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 798: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.01.005

Machado CDS, Aissa AF, Ribeiro DL, Antune L, Greggi M (2019) Vitamin D supplementation alters the expression of genes associated with hypertension and did not induce DNA damage in rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 82: 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2019.1592044

Maestro B, Molero S, Bajo S, Dávila N, Calle C (2002) Transcriptional activation of the human insulin receptor gene by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cell Biochem. Funct. 20: 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbf.951

Meerza D, Naseem I, Ahmed J (2012) Effect of 1, 25(OH)2 vitamin D3 on glucose homeostasis and DNA damage in type 2 diabetic mice. J. Diabetes Complications 26: 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.05.013

Mehri N, Haddadi R, Ganji M, Shahidi S, Soleimani Asl S, Taheri Azandariani M, Ranjbar A (2020) Effects of vitamin D in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease: Behavioral assessment with biochemical investigation of hippocampus and serum. Metab. Brain Dis. 35: 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-019-00529-7

Merino O, Sánchez R, Gregorio B, Sampaio F, Risopatrón J (2018) Effects of diet-induced obesity and deficient in vitamin D on spermatozoa function and DNA integrity in Sprague-Dawley rats. Biomed Res Int. 2018: 5479057. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5479057

Migliaccio S, Di Nisio A, Magno S, Romano F, Barrea L, Colao AM, Muscogiuri G, Savastano S (2022) Vitamin D deficiency: a potential risk factor for cancer in obesity? Int. J. Obes. (Lond). 46: 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-01045-4

Mohammed M, Aboulhoda B, Mahmoud R (2019) Vitamin D attenuates gentamicin-induced acute renal damage via prevention of oxidative stress and DNA damage. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 38: 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327118812166

Myszka M, Klinger M (2014) The immunomodulatory role of Vitamin D. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. (Online) 68: 865–878. https://doi.org/10.5604/17322693.1110168

Nair-Shalliker V, Armstrong BK, Fenech M (2012a) Does vitamin D protect against DNA damage? Mutat. Res. – Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 733: 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.02.005

Nair-Shalliker V, Fenech M, Forder PM, Clements MS, Armstrong BK (2012b) Sunlight and vitamin D affect DNA damage, cell division and cell death in human lymphocytes: a cross-sectional study in South Australia. Mutagenesis 27: 609–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/ges026

Najeeb HA, Othman R, Salih SF, Mohammed AA, Ismaeel Q Al (2020) Vitamin D level and endogenous DNA damage in patients with cancers in Duhok city, KRG-Iraq. Ann. Med. Surg. 10: 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.065

Ng CY, Amini F, Ahmad Bustami N, Tan ESS, Tan PY, Mitra SR (2021) Association of DNA damage with vitamin D and hair heavy metals of obese women. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 17: 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-021-00149-2

O’Callaghan-Gordo C, Kogevinas M, Fthenou E, Pedersen M, Espinosa A, Chalkiadaki G, Daraki V, Dermitzaki E, Decordier I, Georgiou V, Merlo DF, Roumeliotaki T, Vande Loock K, Kleinjans J, Kirsch-Volders M, Chatzi L (2017) Vitamin D insufficient levels during pregnancy and micronuclei frequency in peripheral blood T lymphocytes mothers and newborns (Rhea cohort, Crete). Clin. Nutr. 36: 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.016

Osmancevic A, Sandström K, Gillstedt M, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Larkö O, Wennberg Larkö A-M, F. Holick M, Krogstad A-L (2015) Vitamin D production after UVB exposure – A comparison of exposed skin regions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 143: 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.12.026

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5: 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peng X, Vaishnav A, Murillo G, Alimirah F, Torres KEO, Mehta RG (2010) Protection against cellular stress by 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in breast epithelial cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 110: 1324–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.22646

Petersen B, Wulf HC, Triguero-Mas M, Philipsen PA, Thieden E, Olsen P, Heydenreich J, Dadvand P, Basagaña X, Liljendahl TS, Harrison GI, Segerbäck D, Schmalwieser AW, Young AR, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ (2014) Sun and ski holidays improve vitamin D status, but are associated with high levels of DNA damage. J. Invest. Dermatol. 134: 2806–2813. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.223

Potter TM, Neun BW, Stern. ST (2011) Assay to detect lipid peroxidation upon exposure to nanoparticles. Mol. Biol. 697: 181–89

Qiao W, Yu S, Sun H, Chen L, Wang R, Wu X, Goltzman D, Miao D (2020) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D insufficiency accelerates age-related bone loss by increasing oxidative stress and cell senescence. Am. J. Transl. Res. 12: 507–518. PMID: 32194899

Siebert C, Santos T Dos, Bertó C, Parisi M, Coelho R, Manfredini V, Barbé-Tuana F, Wyse A (2018) Vitamin D supplementation reverses DNA damage and telomeres shortening caused by ovariectomy in hippocampus of wistar rats. Neurotox. Res. 34: 538–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-018-9909-z

Smith SM, Zwart SR, Block G, Rice BL, Davis-Street JE (2005) The nutritional status of astronauts is altered after long-term space flight aboard the International Space Station. J. Nutr. 135: 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.3.437

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355: i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366: l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Talaei A, Mohamadi M, Adgi Z (2013) The effect of vitamin D on insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 5: 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-5-8

Tilstra JS, Robinson AR, Wang J, Gregg SQ, Clauson CL, Reay DP, Nasto LA, St Croix CM, Usas A, Vo N, Huard J, Clemens PR, Stolz DB, Guttridge DC, Watkins SC, Garinis GA, Wang Y, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD (2012) NF-κB inhibition delays DNA damage-induced senescence and aging in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 122: 2601–2612. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI45785

Umar TP, Samudra MG, Nashor KMN, Agustini D, Syakurah RA (2022) Health professional student’s volunteering activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review. Front. Med. 9: 797153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.797153

Umar TP, Siburian R (2022) Routine laboratory testing role for Covid-19 identification: A systematic review. Med. Sci. J. Adv. Res. 3: 99–106. https://doi.org/10.46966/msjar.v3i3.49

Usman M, Woloshynowych M, Britto JC, Bilkevic I, Glassar B, Chapman S, Ford-Adams ME, Desai A, Bain M, Tewfik I, Volpi E V. (2021) Obesity, oxidative DNA damage and vitamin D as predictors of genomic instability in children and adolescents. Int. J. Obes. 45: 2095–2107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00879-2

Vuolo L, Di Somma C, Faggiano A, Colao A (2012) Vitamin D and cancer. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 3: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2012.00058

Wacker M, Holiack MF (2013) Vitamin D-effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation. Nutrients 5: 111–148. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5010111

Wang EW, Collins AR, Pang MYC, Siu PPM, Lai CKY, Woo J, Benzie IFF (2016) Vitamin D and oxidation-induced DNA damage: is there a connection? Mutagenesis 31: 655–659. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gew033

Wenclewska S, Szymczak-Pajor I, Drzewoski J, Bunk M, A Sliwińska (2019) Vitamin D supplementation reduces both oxidative DNA damage and insulin resistance in the Elderly with metabolic disorders. Int J Mol Sci 20: 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20122891

Yavuzer H, Yavuzer S, Cengiz M, Erman H, Doventas A, Balci H, Erdincler DS, Uzun H (2016) Biomarkers of lipid peroxidation related to hypertension in aging. Hypertens. Res. 39: 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2015.156